Uzbekistan has no plans to ease crypto payments ban, says official

crypto list



The Republic of Uzbekistan won’t ever undertake cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (BTC) as a fee technique, in keeping with a central financial institution official.

Behzod Khamraev, deputy chairman of the Central Bank of Uzbekistan (CBU), predicted that native authorities won’t ever permit residents to make use of Bitcoin as fee, alleging that BTC is backed by nothing.

In an interview with native enterprise publication Spot.uz, Khamraev argued that Bitcoin is broadly thought of “speculative” and can by no means grow to be equal to fiat currencies just like the United States greenback, the euro, the Japanese yen or the Russian ruble.

The official identified that there are about 28 trillion Uzbekistani soms in circulation, and all of these are backed by the central financial institution’s property.

“One can even see an inscription about the regulator’s obligations on the banknotes, while cryptocurrency is not backed by anything,” Khamraev added. The official’s feedback got here quickly after El Salvador turned the primary nation on the planet to undertake Bitcoin as authorized tender alongside the U.S. greenback on Sept. 7.

Uzbekistan formally banned its residents from making funds in cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin in late 2019 as a part of an order of the director of the National Agency for Project Management (NAPM) below the president of the Republic of Uzbekistan. “Crypto assets cannot be used as a method of sending or receiving payments on the territory of the Republic of Uzbekistan,” the order mentioned.

Related: More international locations to observe El Salvador’s Bitcoin transfer, Cardano creator says

In April 2021, the NAPM proposed to legalize cryptocurrency buying and selling in Uzbekistan to permit residents to trade crypto property towards nationwide and foreign currency echange. The authority beforehand banned its residents from buying cryptocurrencies in late 2019.

The CBU and the NAPM didn’t instantly reply to Cointelegraph’s request for remark.